Your Window to Inspiration: Seamlessly Browse Tumblr!
AND we need to stop having radfem ideals as the main feminist movement. not only do they often believe this, they also PUSH it as what men will ALWAYS do
radfeminism is no longer about the patriarchy, its about hating men.
radfems often just became or already are sexist, transphobic, and homophobic.
ive seen radfems say that “all men” are the same which INCLUDE CHILDREN!! a CHILD showed signs of sexual abuse but they didnt care BECAUSE it was a male child who went to a female child and pulled her head to his crotch and said “suck”
NO TODDLER WILL DO THAT UNLESS THEY WERE TAUGHT TO AKA SEXUAL. ABUSE.
and radfems OFTEN do and say stuff that tell men that it is completely fine for them to do what they expect all men to do (the crimes that men are statistically more likely to do) which then tells women that they should expect it from them (which then can become victim blaming or even accepting abuse since its “expected”)
the “all men” ideology* is harmful and actively tells men and young boys that it is in their blood and biology to BE harmful people.
one thing people often say (that i agree with) is that we need to stop teaching women to accept abuse from men/defending them and to teach men to stop being abusive. the radfem ideology doesnt do that. it actively tells men that they WILL act that way since its what they always do. it actively HARMS that ideology
*this does not include the “all men” when it comes to randomly in the street, in public, etc. the ideology that you do not know that person therefore they may harm you IS valid. it ISNT valid to say that every man HAVE TO / WILL act a certain way as it tells young boys that they WILL act that way therefore telling them that it is completely fine to act that way. it is just a rebrand of “boys will be boys”
not only that, what about trans people?
do trans men count towards the “not all men” (according to them, it doesnt lmao)
then when you ask them why it often has to do with the fact that we are trans.
if you have to bring up someones PAST identity, the identity they NO LONGER IDENTIFY AS to defend WHY you dont include them in you ideology that has to do with the gender they currently are, then you dont see them as their current identity, only the previous one
as much as i would love to bring up issues that trans women deal with due to radfeminism, i have no clue how to bring it into the conversation as im not a trans women and, due to shitty memory, only remember my own experiences as a trans man when it comes to radfemisim. the og post i reblogged has a wonderful comment speaking on the fact that this also is trans misogyny as it claims that AMABs will always act a certain way, so does it apply to trans women?
again, radfeminism is just transphobia and sexism masked as feminism
it harms everyone. women especially. its essentially telling them that they should expect and accept abuse from men since “it’s what they do”
also, if any radfems see this, im blocking you lmao
this isnt a discussion, argument, etc. between us. i do not care what you have to say
only saying this because ive see a radfem before try to defend themselves in a post talking about the harm of the ideology as a trans man
people gotta stop acting like every single thing a man does is sexually motivated. it's not helping the men who do focus on making things sexually oriented that shouldn't be grow past the behavior. we gotta stop equating every single thing men do to somehow having to do with sex on some level. this is profiling whether or not we want to admit it, and it IS making the problem worse, because it REINFORCES this behavior in men who DO act like this. challenge the notion that all men care about is sex, not reinforce it. all you're doing is being absolutely fucking nasty, and you're especially walking all over sex repulsed men, asexual spectrum men, and men who have sexual trauma.